Modeling and Optimization Teacher Work Innovation : An Empirical Study Using POP-SDM Approach on Vocational Teachers of Private Vocational Schools in Depok
Abstrak
The research aims to find ways and strategies to improve teacher work innovation by analyzing the influence of other variables that influence it. Reasearch using the Modeling and Optimization of Resource Management Approach (POP-SDM). At the initial stage Qualitative exploratory research was conducted on 7 principals of SMK to find variables that affect teacher work innovation. Based on the dominant variables found, a constellation model of research was built through theoretical studies and expert judgment. Furthermore, the research constellation model was tested through quantitative research using SEM-PLS on 157 vocational teachers of SMK. The sub structural models tested were: 1) The direct influence of proactive personality, adversity quotient, organizational support, technological pedagogical content knowledge, and work motivation on teacher work innovation; 2) The direct influence of proactive personality and adversity quotient on technological pedagogical content knowledge; 3) The direct influence of organizational support on work motivation.The study found: 1) Teacher work innovation can be explained by the influence of proactive personality, adversity quotient, organizational support, technological pedagogical content knowledge and work motivation, R2 = 0.753 (75.3%) with the structural equation Y = 0.514X1 + 0.259X2 + 0.579X3 + 0.274X4 + 0.226X5 + ε0.497; 2) technological pedagogical content knowledge can be explained by the influence of proactive personality and adversity quotient, R2 = 0.355 (35.5%) with structural equation X4 = 0.408X1 + 0.303X2 + ε0.803; 3) Work motivation can be explained by the influence of organizational support, R2 = 0.417 (41.7%) with the structural equation X4 = 0.408X1 + 0.303X2 + ε0.803. The value of Q2 = 0.734 indicates the model has a GoF of 73%. (Good category). The results of hypothesis testing also concluded that the variables of technological pedagogical content knowledge and work motivation were not effective as intervening variables. Thus, the improvement of teacher work innovation is more effectively carried out directly through strengthening proactive personality, adversity quotient, organizational support, technological pedagogical content knowledge and work motivation.Sitorem's analysis concluded that organizational support variables and knowledge of pedagogical content had a major influence on teacher work innovation. As a follow-up to the research results, strengthening the indicators that are still weak in these two variables is a priority to be improved immediately.
Referensi
Andriopeulos, Constantin and Patrick Dawson (2009). Managing Change, Creativity, and Innovation, Los Angeles: SAGE.
Baran, Benjamin, Linda Shanock, Lindsay R. Miller (2011). “Advancing Organizational Support Theory into the Twenty-First Century World of Work”, Journal of Business and Psychology, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 15 June, pp. 123-148
Basar, Afip Miftahul (2020). “Problematika Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19”, Edunesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, p-ISSN 2722-5194, Vol 2 No 1 Januari 2021, pp. 208-218.
Bateman, Thomas S. and Scott A. Snell (2015). Management, Leading and Collaborating in A Competitive World, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Berita Resmi Statistik: Keadaan Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia Februari 2020) No. 40/05/Th. XXIII, 05 Mei 2020
Bernholz, Lucy (2011). Evaluating Innovation, MacArthur Foundation.
Cardosa, Gomes, F. (2001). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi Offset.
Colcuitt, J.A., J. LePine, and M. Wesson (2015). Organizational Behavior 4th Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Covey, Steven R. (2004), the 7 Habits of Highly Effective People, New York: Free Press, a Division Simon & Schuster, Inc.
Crant, J. Michael (2000), “Proactive Behavior in Organizations”, Journal of Management, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 435–462.
Dharma, Surya (2013). Tantangan guru SMK abad 21, Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan Menegngah, Ditjen Pendidikan Menengah.
DuBrin, Andrew J. (2014), Proactive Personality and Behavior for Individual and Organizational Productivity, USA: Edward Elgar Pub.
George, Jennifer M. and R. Jones (2012). Understanding and Managing Organizational Behavior, 6th Ed. Boston: Prentice Hall.
Hardhienata, S., (2017). “The Development of Scientific Identification Theory to Conduct Operation Research in Education Management”, IOP Confrence Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Volume 166, doi:10.1088/1757-899X/166/I/012017
Haryono, Siswoyo (2016). Analisis Metode SEM Untuk Penelitian Manajemen dengan Smart-PLS, Bekasi: Intermedia Personalia Utama
https://silabus.org/menciptakan-inovasi-dan-kreativitas-guru/diunduh tanggal 12 Desember 2019, pukul 8.30 Wib)
Iskandar, Sofyan (2008). “Kemampuan Pembelajaran dan Keinovatifan Guru”, Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar No. 9 – April, pp. 1-5.
Koehler Matthew J. Punya Mishra, Kristen Kereluik, Tae Seob Shin, Charles R. Graham (2014) “The Technological Pedagogikcal Content Knowledge Framework”, J.M. Spector et al. (eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communicationsand Technology, New York © Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 101-111
Koh, Joyce (2016). “TPACK Concepts and Practices”, Proceeding the 2nd International Conference on Teacher Training and Education Sebelas Maret University 109 Volume 2 Number 1 2016 ISSN: 25002 – 4124, pp. 109-130
Langton, Nancy and Stephen P. Robbins (2007). Fundamentals of Organizational Behavior, 3rd Canadian edition, Canada: Pearson Education.
Maital, Shlomo D.V.R. Seshadri (2007). Innovation Management, Strategies, Concepts and Tools for Growth and Profit, London: Sage Publication.
Malik, Syaeful, et al (2019). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge With Information and Communication Technology Integration. 5th UPI ICTVET, Atlantis-Press
Margerum-Leys, J., & Marx, R.W. (2002). “Teacher knowledge of educational technology: A case study of student/mentor teacher pairs”. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26 (4), pp. 427-462.
Maxwell, J. C. (2004). Peta Jalan Menuju Sukses, Your Road Map for Success, Batam: Interaksa.
Mishra, Punya, M. J. Koehler (2006). ”Technological Pedagogikcal Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge”, Teachers College Record Volume 108, Number 6, June 2006, pp. 1017–1054
Osborne, Stephen P. and Kerry Brown (2005). Managing Change and Innovation in Public Service Organizations, London: Routledge.
Pangma, Rachapoom, Sombat Tayraukham, and Prasar Nuangchalerm (2009). “Causal Factors Influencing Adversity Quotient of Twelfth Grade and Third-Year Vocational Students”, Journal of Social Science, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2009, pp. 466-470.
Purwanto, A. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Squation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Analysis for Social and Management Research : A Literature Review. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research, 2(4), 114 - 123. https://doi.org/10.7777/jiemar.v2i4.168
Purwanto, A., Purba,J.T, Bernarto,I., Sijabat,R.(2021). The Role of Transformational Leadership, Organizational Citizenship Behaviour, Innovative Work Behaviour, Quality Work Life, Digital Transformation and Leader Member Exchange on Universities Performance. Linguistica Antverpiensia.2021(2).2908-2932
Purwanto, A., Purba,J.T, Bernarto,I., Sijabat,R.( 2021).Pengaruh Servant, Digital dan Green leadership Terhadap Kinerja Industri Manufaktur Melalui Mediasi Komitmen Organisasi, Jurnal Riset Inspirasi Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan Volume 5 No. 1 Edisi Maret 2021 Hal 1-13, DOI : https://doi.org/10.35130/jrimk
Purwanto, A., Purba,J.T, Bernarto,I., Sijabat,R.( (2021).Peran Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB), Transformational and Digital Leadership Terhadap Kinerja Melalui Mediasi Komitmen Organisasi Pada Family Business. Jenius. 4(3). 256-262.http://dx.doi.org/10.32493/JJSDM.v4i3.10454
Purwanto, A., Purba,J.T, Bernarto,I., Sijabat,R (2021). EFFECT OF TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP,JOB SATISFACTION, AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENTS ON ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR. Inovbiz: Jurnal Inovasi Bisnis 9 (2021) 61-69
Purwanto, A., J. T. Purba, I. Bernarto, and R. Sijabat. 2021. Effect of Management Innovation, Transformational leadership and knowledge sharing on Market Performance of Indonesian Consumer Goods Company. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 19(2), 424–434. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya. http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2021.019.02.18.
Pohl, Sabine, Adalgisa Battistelli, dan Julien Librecht (2013). “The Impact of Perceived Organizational Support and Job Characteristics on Nurses Organizational Citizenship Behaviours”. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior 16 (2).pp 193-207.
Rhoades, Linda and Robert Eisenberger (2002), “Perceived Organizational Support: A Review of the Literature”, Journal of Applied Psychology, the American Psychological Association, Inc. Vol. 87, No. 4, 698–714
Robbins, Stephen P. (2006). Perilaku Organisasi, alih bahasa Benjamin Molan, Edisi Bahasa Indonesia, Klaten: Intan Sejati.
Robbins, Stephen P. and Timothy A. Judge (2013). Organizational Behavior, 15th Ed, USA: Prentice Hall.
Santos, Maria C.J. (2012). “Assessing the Effectiveness of the Adapted Adversity Quotient Program in Special Education School”, International Referred Journal, Vol. 3, Issue 4(2), October 2012, pp. 13-23.
Schermerhorn, John R. (2013). Management Learn Succed 12th Ed, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Schermerhorn, John R., James G. Hunt, Richard N. Osborn, Mary Uhl-Bien (2007). Organizational Behavior, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Schmidt, Denise A. E. Baran, A. Thompson, Punya Mishra, et al. (2009). “TPACK: The Development and Validation of an Assessment Instrument for Preservice Teachers”, International Society for Technology in Education, Vol 42 Number 2, pp. 123–149
Shevchenko L.S. (2013). Typologization of Innovation Activity and Innovation in The Educational, Ukraina: Sphere Pravo ta innovatsiyi.
Shivaranjani (2014), “Adversity Quotient: One Stop Solution To Combat Attrition Rate Of Women In Indian It Sector”, International Journal of Business and Administration Research Review, Vol.1, Issue.5, April-June, 2014. Pp. 181-189.
Singh, Sandeep and Tanu Sharma (2017), “Affect of Adversity Quotient on the Occupational Stress”, Published by Elsevier B.V. Procedia Computer 122 (2017). Pp. 86-93
Stoltz, Paul G. (2005). Adversity Quotient, Mengubah Hambatan Menjadi Peluang, Alih Bahasa T. Hermaya, Jakarta: PT Grasindo.
Sumathi, G. N., Kamalanabhan, T.J., Thenmozhi, M (2015). “Impact of work experiences on perceived organizational support: a study among healthcare professionals”. Journal of knowledge, culture and communication. DOI 10.1007/s00146-013-0509-4. No 30. pp. 261-270
Sunaryo, Widodo, Sri Setyaningsih, Soewarto Hardhienata (2020). Pemodelan dan Optimasi Sumber Daya Manajemen (POP-SDM) Sebagai Pendekatan Penelitian Yang Komprehensif, Bandung: Alfabeta.
Syafaruddin dan Asrul (2012). Inovasi Pendidikan, Medan: Perdana Mulya Sarana.
Wexley, Kenneth N and Gary A. Yuki, (2005). Perilaku Organisasi Dan Psikologi Perusahaan, Alih Bahasa: M. Shobarudin, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Wijaya, Tony (2007). “Hubungan Adversity Intelligence dengan Intensi Berwirausaha”, Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, Vo. 9, No.2, September 2007, pp.117-127.
Zagenczck, T.J., Gibney. R., Few. W. T., Scott. K. L. (2011). “Psychological Contracts and Organizational Identification: The Mediating effect of Perceived Organizational Support”. Journal of Labor Research. Vol.32. pp.254-281
