Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah Terhadap Kinerja Sekolah di SDN Dengkek 01 Pati
Abstrak
Artikel ini menganalisa dampak gaya kepemimpinan pada Sekolah Dasar Negeri Dengkek 01 Pati. Fokusnya adalah pada enam gaya kepemimpinan utama yaitu transformasi,transaksional, otokratis, karismatik, birokratis dan demokratis .Artikel ini telah menyediakan wawasan mendalam tentang gaya kepemimpinan yang demokratis, transformasional, birokrasi dan kepemimpinan otokratis memiliki dampak positif pada kinerja guru Sekolah Dasar Negeri 01 Dengkek Pati, Dalam artikel ini menggunakan analisa data primer dan data sekunder yang telah dilakukan. Analisa menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif, dengan bantuan instrumen survei, berdasarkan survei daftar pertanyaan. Penelitian sekunder telah dilakukan melalui tinjauan sebelumnya literatur yang ditetapkan untuk mencapai tujuan penelitian. Hasil artikel ini yaitu menyarankan gaya kepemimpinan karismatik, birokratis dan transaksional memiliki hubungan negatif dengan kinerja. Gaya kepemimpinan transformasional, otokratis, dan demokratis Sebaliknya, memiliki hubungan positif dengan kinerja Sekolah Dasar Negeri 1 Dengkek Pati .
Referensi
Asbari, M., Santoso, P., & Purwanto, A. (2019). Pengaruh Kepemimpinan dan Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Perilaku Kerja Inovatif Pada Industri 4.0. JIM UPB (Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Universitas Putera Batam), 8(1), 7-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.33884/jimupb.v8i1.1562
2) http://openjurnal.unmuhpnk.ac.id/index.php/jp/article/view/1798
3) Bass & Avolio, 1994. Improving Organizational Effectiveness Through Transformational Leadership. London: SAGE Publications.
4) Bhargavi, S. & Yaseen, A., 2016.Leadership Styles and Organizational Performance. Strategic Management Quarterly, 4(1), pp. 87-117.
5) Choi, S., 2007. The lessons of exemplary models for democratic governance. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 2(3), pp. 243-262.
6) Creswell, J. W., 2014. Research Design:Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. London, United Kingdom: SAGE Publications.
7) Elenkov, D. S., 2002. Effects of leadership on organizational performance in Russian companies. Journal of Business Research, 55(6), pp. 467-480.
8) Evy Yanthy, Agus Purwanto, Rudy Pramono, Yoyok Cahyono, Masduki Asbari.(2020). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Transformasional dan Tranksaksional Terhadap Kinerja Sistem Jaminan Halal HAS 23000, BISNIS : Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen Islam,8(1), DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/bisnis.v8i1.7045,
9) Gavrea, C., Ilies, L. & Stegerean, R., 2011. Determinants of organizational performance:The case of Romania. Management & Marketing, 6(2), pp. 285-300.
10) Germano, M. A., 2010. Leadership Style and Organizational Impact. [Online] Available at: http://alaapa. org/newsletter/2010/06/08/spotlight/
11) Harris, A. et al., 2007. Distributed leadership and organizational change: Reviewing the evidence. Journal of Educational Change, 8(4), pp. 337-347.
12) Igbaekemen, G. O. & Odivwri, J. E., 2015. Impact of leadership style on organization performance: A critical literature review. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 5(5), pp. 1-7.10. Iqbal, N., Anwar, S. & Haider, N., 2015.Effect of leadership style on employee performance. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 5(5), pp. 1-6.
13) Innocentius Bernarto, Diana Bachtiar, Niko Sudibjo, Ian Nurpatria Suryawan, Agus Purwanto, Masduki Asbari.(2020). Effect of Transformational Leadership, Perceived Organizational Support, Job Satisfaction Toward Life Satisfaction: Evidences from Indonesian Teachers. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology.29(3). 5495 -5503
14) Jyoti, J. & Bhau, S., 2015. Impact of transformational leadership on job performance: Mediating role of leader member exchange and relational identification. SAGE Open, 5(4), pp. 1-13.
15) Klein, A. S., Cooke, R. A. & Wallis, J., 2013.The impact of leadership styles on organizational culture and firm effectiveness: An empirical study. Journal of Management & Organization, 19(3), pp. 241-254. Kumar, R., 2005. Research Methodology. London: SAGE Publications.
16) Mirayani, R., S.Williana Kusumaningsih, Anggaripeni Mustikasiwi.Agus Purwanto (2019). TRANSFORMATIONAL, AUTHENTIC, AND AUTHORITARIAN TYPES OF LEADERSHIP: WHICH ONE IS THE MOST INFLUENTIAL IN STAFFS’ PERFORMANCE (A Study On Performance In A Religious School Setting). Dinasti International Journal of Education Management And Social Science, 1(2), 172-182. https://doi.org/10.31933/dijemss.v1i2.68
17) Purwanto, A., Asbari, M., & Santoso, P.(2019). Does Culture, Motivation, Competence, Leadership,Commitment Influence Quality Performance?. Jurnal Inovasi Bisnis, 6(2), 201-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35314/inovbiz.v7i2.1210
18) Purwanto, A., Asbari, M., & Santoso, P.(2019).Influence of Transformational and Transactional Leadership Style toward Food Safety Management System ISO 22000:2018 Performance of Food Industry in Pati Central Java. Jurnal Inovasi Bisnis, 6(2), 180-185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35314/inovbiz.v7i2.1213
19) PURWANTO, A., Primahendra, R., Sopa, A., Kusumaningsih, S., & Pramono, R. (2020). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Tansformational, Authentic,Authoritarian, Transactional Terhadap Kinerja Guru Madrasah Aliyah di Tangerang. EVALUASI: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 20-44. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.32478/evaluasi.v4i1.342
20) Purwanto, A., Asbari, M., Prameswari, M., & Ramdan, M. (2020). GAYA KEPEMIMPINAN DI MADRASAH ALIYAH: AUTHENTIC, TANSFORMATIONAL, AUTHORITARIAN ATAU TRANSACTIONAL?. Nidhomul Haq : Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 5(1), 16-31. https://doi.org/10.31538/ndh.v5i1.544